论文部分内容阅读
【要点提示】现行刑法与治安管理处罚法对引诱、容留、介绍他人卖淫都有规定。由于现行刑法及司法解释没有对卖淫行为作出具体界定,手淫行为是否属于刑法上的卖淫行为即成为了本案争议的焦点。因本案被告人介绍、容留多名妇女为他人提供手淫服务的行为属新类型问题,涉及法律适用问题。笔者认为,在法无明文规定的情况下,为获取金钱等利益而提供手淫服务的行为不属于刑法上的卖淫行为,不构成介绍、容留卖淫罪。
[Tip] The current penal law and law and order management of the temptation to seduce, allow, introduce other prostitution have provisions. Since the current criminal law and judicial interpretation do not specifically define prostitution, whether or not masturbation is a criminal offense of prostitution becomes the focus of the controversy in this case. The introduction of the defendant in this case, to allow more women to provide masturbation service for others is a new type of issue, involving the application of law. The author believes that in the absence of express provisions of the law, to provide money and other benefits to provide masturbation service does not belong to criminal acts of prostitution, does not constitute an introduction, to accommodate prostitution.