论文部分内容阅读
马克思的新世界观应当称之为“实践唯物主义新世界”呢,还是应当称之为“辩证唯物主义世界观”呢?这是马克思主义哲学史上长期争论不休、至今尚未解决的最重大的理论问题。黄楠森先生在近年发表的多篇文章里不仅顽固地坚持和宣扬斯大林的所谓马克思主义哲学世界观是辩证唯物主义世界观(旧哲学自然观),而且坚决否认实践观点是马克思主义哲学的首要的基本的观点。我与他的观点、立场和价值取向完全相反,认为辩证唯物主义世界观(自然观)不是马克思主义哲学世界观,而是斯大林哲学世界观和旧哲学的复辟,完全认同和坚决支持实践观点是马克思主义哲学的首要的基本的观点,建议国家应当以马克思的实践唯物主义新世界观为指南,依据马克思原著文本的哲学话语言系统,重新构建马克思主义哲学教学体系,为建设以人为本的科学发展的中国特色社会主义服务。
Should Marx’s new world view be called “a new world of practical materialism” or should it be called “the dialectical materialist world outlook?” This is the most important issue that has been debated and unsolved in the history of Marxist philosophy The theoretical problem. In many articles published in recent years, Mr. Huang Nansen not only stubbornly upheld and proclaimed Stalin’s so-called Marxist philosophical worldview as a dialectical materialist world outlook (the old philosophical view of nature), but also firmly denied that practice view is the primary basic point of view of Marxist philosophy . Contrary to his viewpoint, position and value orientation, I think that the dialectical materialist world outlook (view of nature) is not a Marxist philosophy world outlook but a restoration of the Stalinist worldview and old philosophy. It is Marxist philosophy that Marxism philosophy fully supports and resolutely supports practice , It is suggested that the state should take Marx’s New World Outlook of Practical Materialism as a guide and rebuild the Marxist philosophy teaching system based on the phonetic system of Marx’s original texts so as to build a people-oriented scientific development with Chinese characteristics in socialism service.