论文部分内容阅读
将工程事故的伦理责任都归咎于工程师是不合理的。事实上,工程师在工程活动中通常并不具有独立性的技术话语权,由此他们并不能成为工程事故伦理责任主要承担者。本文以“甬温线事故”为例,辨析了工程事故的伦理责任主体,认为作为工程活动的决策与管理机构的工程组织主体不仅可以成为伦理责任主体,同时还应是工程事故伦理责任的主要承担者。工程组织主体及其负责人伦理责任缺失还是导致工程伦理实践困境的根本原因。
It is unreasonable to blame the engineer for the ethical responsibility of engineering accidents. In fact, engineers often do not have independent technical discourse rights in engineering activities, so they can not become the main undertaker of ethical responsibility for engineering accidents. Taking “Yong Wen Line Accident” as an example, this paper analyzes the main body of ethical responsibility for engineering accidents and considers that the main body of engineering organization as the decision-making and management organ of engineering activities can not only become the main body of ethical responsibility, but also be the ethical responsibility of engineering accidents The main bearer. The lack of ethical responsibility of the main body of the engineering organization and its responsible person is also the root cause of the practical plight of engineering ethics.