论文部分内容阅读
魏源及《海国图志》在近代史上影响巨大,然而关于魏源修改《海国图志》的一些细节问题,在后人的撰述中存有误解之处。由于这些后人撰述现已成为研究魏源的重要参考资料,它们的正确无误因而就显得非常重要。笔者在研读这些撰述时发现,有些重要撰述包括《清史列传》都持一共同观点,即魏源曾依据广东近代著名学者陈澧的《书〈海国图志〉后呈张南山先生》,屡次修改《海国图志》。然而事实并非如此。首先,这一观点的证据不足;其次,将陈文与50卷本、60卷本、100卷本《海国图志·筹海篇》相比较,可以证实魏源基本未采纳陈澧的建议。
Wei Yuan and “Illustrated Maritime States” have great influence in modern history. However, some details about Wei Yuan’s revision of the “Illustrated Maritime States” have misunderstandings in his later writings. Because these descendants’ writings have now become an important reference for studying Wei Yuan, their correctness is therefore of great importance. When I read these essays, I found that some important essays, including the Biography of the Qing History, hold the common view that Wei Yuan once revisited Zhang Nanshan according to the book “The Book of Sea States” written by the famous modern scholar in Guangdong Province, “Sea map.” However, it is not. First of all, there is not enough evidence in this view. Secondly, compared with 50 volumes, 60 volumes, and 100 volumes of “Illustrations of the Sea State and the Sea”, it can be proved that Wei Yuan basically did not adopt Chen’s proposal.