一“按劳分配”还能不能发揮积极作用关于“按劳取酬”的問題,近来颇有些爭論;这爭論大体上是随农村开始实行“部份供給制”展开的,等到城市工人也提出要取消“計件論资”之后,对“按劳取酬”的非议就更多了。曾經有一个时期,“按劳取酬”被說得好象是就要完結其历史使命的东西;甚至被說成是从来便不該有的东西;这是片面的看法。首先我觉得应該指出的是:某个制度是否合理和是好是坏,是一个問題;某个制度是否会成为客观存在,又是另一个問題;把“按劳取酬”說得再坏些,也并不等于这个制度就該馬上消灭。 A “distribution according to work” still can not play an active role “On the basis of remuneration for work”, there has been quite a bit of controversy lately; the debate has largely started with the introduction of “partial supply” in rural areas, After canceling the “piece-rate theory,” there will be even more criticisms of “paying wages according to work.” There was a period when “paying according to labor” was said to be something that is about to end its historical mission; it was even said to be something that should never have existed; this is a one-sided view. First of all, I think it should be pointed out: Whether a system is reasonable and good or bad is a question; whether a system will become an objective reality or another problem; Some, it does not mean that the system should be eliminated immediately.