论文部分内容阅读
自“二战”以来,对精神利益的保护日渐成为世界性的潮流。随着我国法治建设的不断推进,精神损害赔偿已成为法学理论界和司法实务中的一个热点和难点问题。关于精神损害赔偿,尽管有最高人民法院的司法解释作指导,但理论界的争论仍然大量存在,司法实践中仍然主要凭借法官的自由裁量断案。这与当前我国的法治发展要求显然不符。为此,必须从我国国情出发,制定相应的参照标准,同时在法律框架下发挥法官的自由裁量权。
Since World War II, the protection of spiritual interests has become a worldwide trend. With the continuous promotion of the construction of the rule of law in our country, compensation for mental damage has become a hot and difficult issue in the field of legal theory and judicial practice. In spite of the Supreme People's Court's judicial interpretation as a guide, the controversy in the theoretical circles still exists in large numbers. The judicial practice still depends mainly on judges' discretion. This is obviously incompatible with the current development of the rule of law in our country. To this end, we must proceed from our own national conditions, formulate the corresponding reference standards, and at the same time, exert the judges' discretion under the legal framework.