论文部分内容阅读
《超限战》出版之时,恰逢美国及其盟友对伊拉克的“沙漠之狐”行动结束不久和对南联盟的“盟军”行动开始之前,在国内外军事理论界引起了广泛注意和高度评价。 作者提出的如下几个新观念尤其值得高度重视: “有什么武器打什么仗”与“打什么仗造什么武器”。尽管“有什么武器打什么仗”这句话就其本质而言是消极的,因为它的潜台词所折射的是一种无奈,我们却无意贬低它在今天所具有的积极意义,这种积极意义就是立足现有武器,寻找最佳战法。“打什么仗造什么武器”这种带有鲜明时代特点和实验室特下的做法,既
At the time of the publication of the “Transfinite War,” it coincided with the widespread attention paid by the United States and its allies to the military theoretical circles both at home and abroad and just before the end of the “Desert Fox” operation of Iraq and the “allied” campaign against the FRY Highly praised. In particular, the following new ideas put forward by the author deserve particular attention: “What arms fight and what war?” Although the phrase “what arms fight is fought” is by its very nature negative because its subtext reflects a sense of helplessness, we do not intend to belittle the positive meaning it has today, and this positive meaning Is based on existing weapons, looking for the best tactics. “What kind of fight to fight what weapons” This is a distinctive feature of the times and the laboratory under the practice, both