论文部分内容阅读
对日常生活重要意义的研究根植于欧洲批判理论传统,文化研究和后结构主义都继承了这一视角并对日常生活中的“抵抗”进行了严肃思考。“社会性”在此处指未被社会正式接纳的某些因素。以福柯为代表的后结构主义权力分析、以费斯克为代表的文化研究媒介分析和德赛都的日常生活分析都对抵抗的场所、条件及其效果进行了论述。抵抗的意义不仅在于反抗体制所带来的压迫,还在于它使文化多元性得以彰显,同时也拓展了社会实践的含义,因此抵抗的视角对后现代日常生活来说意义重大。
The research on the significance of daily life is rooted in the tradition of critical theory in Europe. Both cultural studies and post-structuralism inherit this perspective and seriously consider “resistance ” in daily life. “Social ” here refers to some factors not formally accepted by society. Post-structuralist power analysis represented by Foucault, media analysis of cultural studies represented by Fiske and daily life analysis of Deshamerica all discuss the place, conditions and effects of resistance. The significance of resistance lies not only in the repression brought by the rebel system, but also in the fact that it enables cultural diversity to be demonstrated and at the same time expands the meaning of social practice. Therefore, the perspective of resistance is of great significance to post-modern daily life.