论文部分内容阅读
许多评论电影《茶馆》结尾的文章,都对此片与老舍原著不同的结尾大加赞誉,认为是电影编导的独到之处。对此,我认为大谬不然。试想,在解放军即将兵临城下,北平解放指日可待,儿子又投奔了解放区的时候,深谙世事、饱经劫难、具有顽强生命力的王掌柜怎能因茶馆被占而去寻死呢?诚然,王掌柜当时失去了赖以生存的茶馆,举目无亲,孑然一身,看来是到了“山穷水复疑无路”的绝境。但略加分析,便会确信,只要他坚持活下去(凭他
Many articles commenting at the end of the movie “Teahouse” all praised the film as being different from the original one, and considered it a unique feature of film directors. In this regard, I think big wrong otherwise. Imagine, under the impending marching of the People’s Liberation Army, Beiping liberation just around the corner, the son went to the liberated areas, when he was familiar with the world, full of catastrophe, with tenacious vitality Wang dispensers how to get killed because of the tea house? True, the king dispensers then lost Relying on the survival of the teahouse, unaccompanied, solitude, it seems to be “desperately lackluster” desperation. But a little analysis, we will be convinced, as long as he insisted on living (by him