论文部分内容阅读
对于法院能否改变罪名的问题学界和实务界争议都很大。龙宗智先生认为因为立法和司法解释已将判决改变罪名的权力明确赋予法院,因而法院改变罪名就不是法院有没有权力的问题,而是如何具体运作的问题,即是一个程序问题,从而建言应设置一个罪名改变通知程序来进行具体运作并进一步论证了其合理和可行性。该程序具体运作由于庭审结构畸变导致法理上的不合理,条件上的不支撑,实践上的不可行,实效上的难如愿。对协商无效后作出无罪判决更为理性。
There are many controversies in the academic and practical circles about whether courts can change their charges. Mr. Long Zongzhi considered that because the legislative and judicial interpretations have clearly given the court the power to change the guilty verdict, the court’s change of guilt is not a question of whether the court has power, but how it operates. This is a procedural issue, so as to make suggestions A guilty altering notification procedure should be set up to carry out the specific operation and demonstrate its reasonableness and feasibility. The specific operation of the procedure as a result of the trial structure distortion led to unreasonable jurisprudence, the conditions do not support, in practice is not feasible, the actual hard to do so. It is more rational to make a verdict of innocence after the agreement is invalidated.