论文部分内容阅读
在康熙、乾隆年间清廷倡导“敦崇礼教”“文教是先”的政治文化背景下,胡抡作为早期“张扬朱学派”《仪礼》研究的代表性学者,著述完成了《礼乐通考》三十卷,以其独特的礼学文献纂辑和诠释方式,引起了许多礼学名家的关注和重视,扬弃和发展了宋代大学者朱熹的问学主张。胡抡对朱子礼学研究的承继之处,主要体现在礼学思想、礼制文献征引、文献编排方式等方面;与此同时,胡抡的礼学研究也加入了自身的个性化学术元素,在对待《礼记》一书的态度、文献编纂的方式、引书范围、注释文献的征引、案语部分的礼俗化考察等方面,有别于朱子《通解》的解经风格,体现出求真求是求新的治学作风。
Under the political and cultural background of “imperial education” and “culture and education are the first” in the period of Emperor Kangxi and Qianlong years, as a representative scholar of early “publicizing Zhu school ” “ritual” Thirty volumes of “Rites and Music Examination” have been completed. With their unique compilation and interpretation of ritual literature, they have aroused the attention and emphasis of many rites and scholars, and abandoned and developed Zhu Xi ’s claim of learning in Song Dynasty. Hu 抡 inherits the research on the rituals of Zhu Xi mainly in the aspects of ritual thoughts, references of ritual literature and ways of documenting the rituals. At the same time, his study of rituals also incorporates his own personalized academic elements, It is different from Zhu Zi’s “Tong Jie” style in his treatment of the book of Book of Rites, the way of compiling literature, the range of quotations, the quotation of annotated documents and the etiquette investigation of the part of the text. Really seek a new style of study.