我只想就所选案例的典型性问题对《公有制企业改革中控制权的分配》一文提一点看法。案例的意义在于典型性。愈是典型就愈能说明问题;反过来说也是一样,愈能说明问题的案例就愈有典型意义。该文的主题是“公有制企业改革中控制权的分配”。那末,什么样的企业是我国典型的公有制企业?应该说是国有大中型企业。该文选择的研究对象是乡镇集体企业,且规模很小,企业总资产和净资产分 I just want to make a point about the typical issue of the selected case on the article entitled “Allocation of Control in the Reform of Public-owned Enterprises”. The significance of the case is typical. The more typical the more the problem can be explained; the reverse is the same, the more case-by-case the more typical. The theme of this paper is “Distribution of Control Rights in the Reform of Public-owned Enterprises.” So, what kind of enterprises are typical public-owned enterprises in our country? It should be said that the state-owned large and medium-sized enterprises. This article chooses the research object is the township collective enterprise, and the scale is very small, enterprise total assets and net assets