我当报纸编辑多年,对附稿件来的信起初不重视,认为信上无非说一些“关照”、“扶助”之类的客套话。一次,一位老编辑对我说:“附稿信疏忽不得,它是编辑了解通讯员和作者写作动机的重要渠道,是对来稿的有益的补充和旁证,是发现新的新闻线索的一个来源。”他的话使我开始注意阅读附稿信。在我们报社,附稿信每天有几十封,我把这些信分成四类:第一类,诚挚的表白。这类信大都是表明为什么写稿和对编辑的期望。我选择有代表性的及时回信鼓励并提出努力方向。第二类,可靠的依据。这类信写的是稿件的一些旁证、数据、来源等,很有参考价值。我将这些信和稿 When I was a newspaper editor for many years, I initially attached little importance to the letters accompanying my articles and believed that the letter was nothing more than a courtesy call on “care” or “aid.” Once, an old editor told me: "Attached manuscripts are negligent. It is an important channel for editors to understand the motivations of correspondents and writers. It is a useful supplement and circumstantial evidence for contributions and a source of new news clues. His words led me to pay attention to reading the attached manuscript. In our newspaper, there are dozens of attachment letters a day, and I classify these letters into four categories: the first category and the sincere confession. Most of these letters show why writing and editing expectations are. I choose to have a representative reply in time to encourage and put forward efforts. The second category, reliable basis. This type of letter is written by a number of circumstantial evidence, data, sources, a great reference value. I will these letters and draft