论文部分内容阅读
由于同意同时蕴含作为尊严之根据的自律或自治的两个必要条件——自由与约束或管理,因此,人们可以根据康德的思想确认其蕴含对人之尊严的尊重。在存在着第三方压力的同意情境中,即使非法的、具有足够控制力或影响力的第三方威胁可能造成同意无效,但同意接受者是否能根据这样的同意表征而行动、其在这种情境中可能或应当做什么却取决于更多的因素,其中最重要的因素仍然是对于同意方之尊严的尊重。只有诉诸实际同意,才可能因同意者之自治得以可能而有了对其尊严的尊重。因此,用来证成帕累托改进的可能不符合实际同意的推定同意,其实并不能从尊重人之尊严的角度为帕累托改进提供正当性证明。
By agreeing to contain both the necessary and necessary conditions of self-regulation or self-government as the basis for dignity - freedom and restraint or management, one can confirm from Kant’s thought that it contains respect for human dignity. In a consenting situation where there is third-party pressure, even if an unlawful third party threat of sufficient force or influence may invalidate the consent, it is agreed that the recipient can act on such consent characterization, What is possible or what should be done depends on many more factors, the most important being the respect for the dignity of the consenting party. Only with the actual consent can it be possible to respect the dignity of the consenter because of its autonomy. Therefore, the presumption of consent, which may prove to be Pareto’s improvements, which may not be in conformity with the actual consent, does not in fact justify the Pareto improvement from the perspective of respecting human dignity.