在研究媒体语言和思维二者关系时,萨皮尔—沃尔夫假说的提出,将其明确归纳为“强势”假说理论和“弱势”假说理论。这两种理论从不同程度上解释了语言对于思维的影响。本文主要以《人民日报》为例,针对报中关于哥本哈根气候峰会的报道进行讨论,重点分析新闻报道中媒体语言与思维的关系。 In the study of the relationship between media language and thinking, the proposal of the Sapir-Wolfe hypothesis is categorized as the “strong” hypothesis and the “weak” hypothesis theory. To varying degrees, these two theories explain the impact of language on thinking. This article takes “People’s Daily” as an example to discuss the coverage of the report on the climate summit in Copenhagen, focusing on the relationship between media language and thinking in news reports.