目的：比较对支撑喉镜下声带息肉摘除术两种不同麻醉方法的效果。方法：将９２例病人分成两组，Ⅰ组５２例采用静脉复合麻醉，以咪唑安定、异丙酚、芬太尼、琥珀胆碱诱导，气管插管后静滴０２％异丙酚和０１％琥珀胆碱；Ⅱ组４０例采用静吸复合麻醉，以咪唑安定、硫喷妥钠、芬太尼、琥珀胆碱诱导，气管插管后静滴０１％普鲁卡因和０１％琥珀胆碱，同时吸入安氟醚或异氟醚。分别监测两组病人麻醉前、插管前、插管后及支撑喉镜插入后的心率（ＨＲ）、平均动脉压（ＭＡＰ）、术后清醒时间、术毕躁动及恶心呕吐情况。结果：Ⅰ组病人麻醉及手术过程中，ＭＡＰ、ＨＲ平稳，术毕患者苏醒快，苏醒质量佳。Ⅱ组病人则ＭＡＰ、ＨＲ波动较大，苏醒相对缓慢，苏醒质量相对欠佳。结论：Ⅰ组静脉复合麻醉效果明显优于Ⅱ组静吸复合麻醉 OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two different methods of anesthesia on vocal cord polyp excision under support laryngoscopy. Methods: Ninety-two patients were divided into two groups. Fifty-two patients in group Ⅰ were induced by intravenous anesthesia and were induced by midazolam, propofol, fentanyl and succinylcholine. After intravenous intubation, 0.2% propofol and 01% succinylcholine. In group Ⅱ, 40 patients were induced by static inhalation combined with midazolam, thiopental sodium, fentanyl and succinylcholine. After intravenous intubation, 0.2% procaine And 0  1% succinylcholine inhalation of enflurane or isoflurane. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), postoperative wakefulness, postoperative agitation and nausea and vomiting were measured before anesthesia, intubation, intubation and laryngoscope insertion respectively. Results: During the anesthesia and operation of group Ⅰ, MAP and HR were stable. The patients recovered quickly and the quality of recovery was good. In group Ⅱ, the MAP and HR fluctuated greatly, the recovery was relatively slow, and the quality of recovery was relatively poor. Conclusion: The intravenous anesthesia in group Ⅰ is better than that in group Ⅱ