论文部分内容阅读
目的:对某农村地区妇女艾滋病健康教育干预的远期效果进行评价。方法:对干预组和对照组分别进行问卷调查,内容包括调查对象的基本情况、艾滋病基本知识以及相关的看法和态度等。单因素和多因素分析方法相结合评价干预效果。结果:与对照组相比,干预组知晓可通过共用注射器、使用未合格消毒注射器传播的比例更高,但回答握手和吃饭不会传播以及蚊虫叮咬不会传播的比例却比对照组低。多因素Logistic回归模型显示干预组农村妇女艾滋病综合知识知晓的可能性是对照组的2.54倍(OR=2.535,95%CI:1.287～4.990),而曾经通过电视了解者是未看电视者的2.05倍(OR=2.050,95%CI:1.067～3.939)。结论:农村妇女艾滋病健康教育干预在远期具有一定的效果,但较为有限。干预的效果与干预的内容极为密切,尚存知识的盲点和漏洞。提示艾滋病健康教育需要进一步加强、深入和细化。
Objective: To evaluate the long-term effect of HIV / AIDS health education intervention in a rural area. Methods: The intervention group and control group were surveyed, including the basic information of the respondents, the basic knowledge of AIDS and related attitudes and attitudes. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the effect of intervention. RESULTS: The intervention group was more aware of the higher rate of sharing through syringes than the control group, but the rate of answering handshaking and eating did not spread and mosquito bites did not spread as compared to controls. Multivariate Logistic regression model showed that the probability of HIV / AIDS knowledge among rural women in intervention group was 2.54 times that of control group (OR = 2.535, 95% CI: 1.287-4.990) and 2.05 (OR = 2.050, 95% CI: 1.067 ~ 3.939). Conclusion: HIV / AIDS education for rural women has some effect in the long run, but it is limited. The effect of the intervention is very close to the content of the intervention, with the blind spots and loopholes of the surviving knowledge. Prompted AIDS health education needs to be further strengthened, in-depth and detailed.