论文部分内容阅读
紧急状态下人权克减的直接目的是国家安全,但是其最终目的应是人权保障。虽然《公民权利与政治权利公约》并没有将第14条规定确立为不可克减的条款,但是国际人道法与国际人权法的相关规定表明,公正审判权并非可以随意克减的人权。中国虽然有关于紧急状态的法律规定,但是缺乏紧急状态下人权保障的具体规定。当前中国应制定紧急状态法,在该法中明确规定公正审判权的保障标准。
The immediate purpose of derogation from human rights in emergencies is national security, but its ultimate goal should be the protection of human rights. Although the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights did not establish article 14 as a non-derogable clause, the relevant provisions of international humanitarian law and international human rights law show that the right to a fair trial is not an arbitrarily derogable human right. Although China has legal provisions on emergency situations, it lacks specific provisions on the protection of human rights in emergency situations. At present, China should formulate a state of emergency law, which explicitly stipulates the guarantee standard of fair trial power.