贵刊今年第10期载有《〈子路、曾皙、冉有、公西华侍坐〉的谈话环境》一文。(以下简称《环》)该文否定了《教师教学用书》中孔子“为他们创造一个轻松、亲切、活跃的环境”的说法,认为谈话的氛围是“沉闷”的,而且说“这沉闷的氛围恰恰是孔子制造的”。笔者以为《教师教学用书》所说的并不错,而《环》文所说的不切实。为此,试作讨论如下: The 10th edition of your magazine this year contains the article “Speaking Environment of Zilu, Zengqi, Youyou, Gongxihua Waiting”. (hereinafter referred to as “The Ring”) This article denies Confucius “to create a relaxed, cordial, and active environment for them” in the “Teaching Books for Teachers”, and thinks that the atmosphere of the conversation is “dimsome ” and that “This boring atmosphere is exactly what Confucius created.” The author thinks that the “teacher’s teaching book” is not bad, and the “ring” article is not practical. For this purpose, the test is discussed as follows: