论文部分内容阅读
自信托业“一法两规”颁布实施以来,资产收益权信托产品屡现于市场。资产收益权作为基础资产运用于信托业务是否能获得法律支持,对信托业乃至整个财富管理行业都有着深远的影响。本案例以安信信托诉昆山纯高金融借款合同纠纷一案一审判决,这个金融业具有划时代意义的典型案例为背景,探讨关于资产收益财产权信托的合法性问题、阴阳主合同及抵押效力的认定以及财务顾问费(融资服务费)的合法性。并从本案例中引出的信托-资产管理公司管理者值得注意的问题。
Since the trust industry “a law two rules ” promulgated and implemented since the assets of the right to trust trust products in the market. The application of the right of asset return as the basic asset to the trust business can obtain legal support and have a far-reaching impact on the trust industry and the entire wealth management industry. This case is based on the first instance ruling of Anshun Trust v. Kunshan Pure Gold Financial Loan Contract dispute. This financial industry has epoch-making typical cases as the background. It discusses the legality of trust property right property trust, the identification of yin and yang master contract and mortgage effect, Financial advisory fees (financing service fees) of the legitimacy. And from this case leads to the trust - asset management company managers noteworthy issues.