论文部分内容阅读
传统社会向现代社会的过渡常常导致社会冲突,解决冲突的方式不一,其中以改革和革命为主。当改革不足以解决尖锐的社会冲突之时,革命便不可避免,旧制度随之寿终正寝,而由国家实施的改革模式则力主法律的继承性和合理化变化。19—20世纪初的俄国则成为这样两种社会发展模式博弈的舞台。俄国通过革命解决了当时的社会冲突,其革命模式对许多亚非拉国家产生了深远影响。然而,这些采取革命方式解决冲突的国家多以失败告终,不仅未能步入现代化道路,反而使国家陷入混乱状态。现代化进程顺利与否完全取决于其自身的历史条件与外部因素,盲目效仿他人不足取。
The transition from the traditional society to the modern society often leads to social conflicts and different ways of resolving the conflicts, of which the reform and the revolution are the major ones. When the reform is not enough to solve the sharp social conflicts, the revolution will inevitably occur, and the old system will come to an end. The reform mode implemented by the state will dominate the law inheritance and rationalization. Russia in the early 19 to 20 century became the stage for such two kinds of social development model games. Russia resolved the then social conflicts through revolution and its revolutionary model had far-reaching effects on many Asian, African and Latin American countries. However, those countries that took a revolutionary approach to resolving the conflict ended up unsuccessfully. They not only failed to step into the path of modernization but instead brought the country into chaos. The smooth progress of modernization depends entirely on its own historical conditions and external factors, blindly follow the example of others.