论文部分内容阅读
第三区域因采取政企统合治理模式而与城市治理和乡村治理形成显著的差异。这种治理模式的组织结构特征集中体现为统合性、大部门制和不均衡性,并由此形成了统合型的权力分布形态,关联事权的一体化和重决策执行、轻监督的权力配置关系。这种治理模式和集权结构内生于地方官员在“增长考核”下的经营策略和效率追求,并在“底线增长”的政治逻辑约束下具有持续的稳定性。与此同时,政绩依赖、权力的统合性以及民主监督的限度弱化了权力控权和权利控权两种控权机制,并由此引发了第三区域治理中的高廉政风险。
The third region formed a significant difference with urban governance and rural governance by adopting a unified government-enterprise governance model. The organizational structure of this mode of governance embodies the characteristics of centralized, most of the system and the imbalance, and thus formed a unified form of power distribution, the integration of power and the implementation of heavy decision-making, light supervision of the power allocation relationship . This pattern of governance and centralized structure is born of local officials’ pursuit of business strategies and efficiency under “growth assessment ” and has continued to be stable under the political logic of “bottom line growth ”. At the same time, the dependence on political performance, the unification of power and the limit of democratic supervision weakened the two control mechanisms of power control and right control, which triggered the high government risk in the governance of the third region.