论文部分内容阅读
元语否定是一种重要的自然语言否定现象 ,具有非真值函数意义。本文从元语否定的角度解释语用学的先设否定现象 ,参照关联理论的原则 ,在对Burton -Roberts和Carston的“再分析”模型的比较研究中 ,发现两者的主要区别在于对否定算子辖域的确定机制上。即前者用语义机制确定辖域 ,后者则用语用推理和语境参与确定辖域。能够将元语否定的语义和语用机制相结合的则是直接触及意义建构心理动因的认知语言学理论模型 ,主要包括框架、理想认知模型等 ,将元语否定现象诉诸框架间否定和理想认知模型的否定和重建 ,有利于从认知心理的底层探讨先设否定现象 ,有重要的理论启发意义。借用认知语言学的概念分析元语否定还可以说明认知机制在建构人类知识框架和现实世界时发挥的重要作用。
The negation of the metaphor is an important negation of natural language and has the meaning of non-truth value function. In this paper, I explain the pragmatic denial of pragmatics from the perspective of the negation of the metaphor. In the comparative study of Burton-Roberts and Carston’s “re-analysis” model, referring to the principle of relevance theory, I find that the main difference between the two is that Operator jurisdictions to determine the mechanism. That is, the former uses the semantic mechanism to determine the jurisdiction, while the latter uses the pragmatic reasoning and context to determine the jurisdiction. The combination of semantic and pragmatic mechanisms that can negate the elemental language is a cognitive linguistic theoretical model that directly touches on the construction of the psychological motivation of meaning, including the framework and the ideal cognitive model, and so on. And the ideal cognitive model of negation and reconstruction, from the bottom of cognitive psychology to explore the first set of negative phenomena, there is an important theoretical inspiration. Using the concept of cognitive linguistics to analyze negative verb can also illustrate the important role that cognitive mechanisms play in the construction of human knowledge framework and the real world.