论文部分内容阅读
西方“哲学”在其发轫期的确与逻辑及论证内在相关,但在后来的历史演变中,其意义发生了深刻变化。中世纪神学遇到的内在困境、黑格尔哲学以逻辑方式孕育出来的超逻辑结果、逻辑实证主义拒斥“形而上学”的失败、海德格尔对逻辑的不信任和对诗与思的一致性的追求,无一不显示出哲学的最高境界同逻辑及论证的分离之可能性和正当性。这一参照使我们有可能重新看待“中国思想”在达成“哲学”目标上的优长之处,从而为“中国哲学”这一称谓的合法性作出某种辩护。
The western philosophy was intrinsically related to logic and argumentation during its development, but profound changes have taken place in its subsequent historical evolution. The internal predicament encountered by medieval theology, the super-logical result that Hegel’s philosophy gave birth in logic, the failure of logical positivism rejecting metaphysics, Heidegger’s mistrust of logic and the unity of poetry and thought Sexual pursuits all show the possibility and legitimacy of separating the highest state of philosophy from that of logic and argumentation. This reference makes it possible for us to revisit the superiority of “Chinese thought” in reaching the goal of “philosophy” and thus to provide some justification for the legitimacy of the title “Chinese philosophy.”