论文部分内容阅读
在《司法过程的性质》一书中,卡多佐大法官试图解释上诉法官如何在司法决策过程中克服个人偏好~①。他的理论是,一个上诉法庭成员间的不同看法能够实现“相互间的平衡”~②。卡多佐提出的理由是:“正是在不同意见的摩擦过程中,才锻造了某种具有稳定性和一致性的东西,并且其平均价值大于组成要素。”~③按照字面解释,摩擦(attrition)是指因持续的攻击或施压而挫败,或因冲突而挫败。~④卡多佐大法官选用摩擦
In The Nature of the Judicial Process, Lord Cardoso attempted to explain how the appellate judge overcame personal preferences in the judicial decision-making process. His theory is that the different views of a member of the Court of Appeal can achieve “mutual balance ” ~ ②. Cardozo put forward the following reasons: “It is precisely in the process of friction with different opinions that a certain stability and consistency are forged and the average value is greater than the constituent elements.” "③ According to the literal interpretation, Attrition is the frustration of sustained attack or pressure, or the defeat of a conflict. ~ ④ Justice Cardoso use friction