论文部分内容阅读
看即是对象。看与认识、逻辑的最大区别就在于,对象在认识、逻辑概念之外,却在看之内。看通过对象出现,对象则在看中显现。没有看的对象,或者没有对象的看都是不可想象的。康德批判没有看的对象,指斥为不可认识的物自体;同样批判没有对象的看,指斥为不存在的理智直观。有什么样的看就有什么样的对象;反之,有什么样的对象也就有什么样的看。矛盾与悖论产生于看与对象的错位;当我们用对感官对象的看去看一个理智对象时,理智对象与感官对象之间就会发生难解的悖论。存在对象变化了,我们的看也随之变化;反之亦然。对象是由看建构出来的,直观构成自然物及其性质、法则和形式;物的矛盾性也是由直观构成的。直观构成科学知识的精确客观性,并构成以其为标准的科学世界,这一直观特指一种数学化的态度、一种数学的眼光。
Seeing is the object. The biggest difference between seeing and understanding and logic lies in the fact that the object is beyond the concept of understanding and logic. See through the object appears, the object appears in fancy. It is inconceivable that no object or object can be seen. Kant’s criticism does not see the object, denounced as unidentifiable material self; the same criticism of no object to see, denounced the absence of rational intuition. What kind of look like what kind of object; the other hand, what kind of object will have what kind of look. Contradictions and paradoxes arise from the dislocation between view and object. When we look at a sensible object from the perspective of the sensual object, a paradoxical solution arises between the sensible object and the sensual object. The existence of objects has changed, and our perceptions have also changed; and vice versa. Objects are constructed from the perspective of seeing, constituting the natural objects intuitively and their nature, law and form; the contradiction of objects is also composed of intuition. Intuitive composition of scientific knowledge of the objective objectivity, and constitute the standard of the scientific world, the visual especially refers to a mathematical attitude, a mathematical perspective.