论文部分内容阅读
中国史学如何走向21世纪?21世纪的中国史学的内涵及特征又是怎样的?在中国史学与西方史学的学术交流日渐增多的现阶段,要不要坚持民族特色?何谓民族特色?民族特色和21世纪中国史学的发展究竟是怎样的关系?这一系列问题,在当下的中国史学界引起了热烈的讨论。为充分和集中地表达意见,本刊特组织4篇笔谈,以期对“走向世界的中国史学”的研讨有所推动。著名学者瞿林东、张广智认为中国史学走向世界必须坚持民族特色,并各自对此问题作了不同的阐述。来自台湾的学者戴晋新则对此问题进行了全方位的考察,提出了自己的思考,极大地拓展了问题的空间。周一平等对21世纪中国史学的基本发展作了具体的诠释,周一平认为比较研究是中国史学参与国际学术交流的必由之路和良好方法。
How does Chinese historiography go in the 21st century? What are the connotations and characteristics of Chinese historiography in the 21st century? At the present stage of increasing academic exchanges between Chinese historiography and Western historiography, do we not insist on national features? What are the characteristics of nationalities? What is the relationship between the development of Chinese historiography in the 21st century? This series of questions has caused heated discussions in the contemporary Chinese historians. To fully and collectively express their opinions, we organized a series of four written speeches with a view to promoting the discussion of “Chinese history going to the world.” Well-known scholar Qu Lindong, Zhang Guangzhi that the Chinese historiography to the world must adhere to national characteristics, and each of them made a different elaboration of the issue. Dai Jinxin, a scholar from Taiwan, conducted a comprehensive investigation of this issue and put forward his own thinking, which greatly expanded the space for the issue. On Monday, Equalization made a concrete interpretation of the basic development of Chinese historiography in the 21st century. Zhou Yiping thought that comparative study is the only way and a good method for Chinese historiography to participate in international academic exchanges.