论文部分内容阅读
现行工具书把“毕竟”类语气副词解释为 :“表示追根究底所得的结论”,“强调原因或特点”,“归根到底。有加强语言的作用”等 ,但并未揭示出这类副词的全部含义。如对“小张反反复复地给小王解释了老半天 ,小王毕竟明白了”;“小张反反复复地给小王解释了老半天 ,小王还是不明白 ,小张毕竟没办法了”这样的句子 ,用现行释义无法说明其错在何处。通过对该类词语在陈述句中的预设及与让转句之间逻辑语义关系的分析 ,提出并证明“毕竟”类词语具有隐性的语法功能 ,即表让步转折关系
The current tool book interprets “after all” kind of adverbs as follows: “to express the conclusion of the final analysis”, “to emphasize the reasons or characteristics”, “to the final analysis, to strengthen the role of language”, etc., but no such adverbs have been disclosed The full meaning of Such as the “Zhang repeatedly explained to the old man for a long time, Xiao Wang understand”; “Xiao Zhang repeatedly explained to the old man a long time, Wang still do not understand, Xiao Zhang, after all, no way A ”such sentence, with the current paraphrase can not explain where is wrong. Through the analysis of the presuppositions of such words in declarative sentences and the logical semantic relationship between them, this paper proposes and proves that “after all” kind of words have implicit grammatical functions, that is, the relationship between concession and concession