行政诉讼法规定:“人民法院对行政案件宣告判决或者裁定前,原告申请撤诉的,或者被告改变其所作的具体行政行为,原告同意并申请撤诉的,是否准许,由人民法院裁定。”而对于“被告改变其所作的具体行政行为”(下称改变行为)的性质,法律及司法解释均无规定。实践中有一种观点认为改变行为属于被告在行政诉讼中的诉讼行为,不是被告在行政诉讼中继续行使行政职权的行政行为,(见《人民司法》1992年第3期“被告改变具体行政行为的有关程序问题探析”一文)对此,笔者不能苟同。 改变行为是被告在行政诉讼中实施的,它可能引起原告申请撤诉及人民法院裁定是否准许撤诉等诉讼 The Administrative Procedure Law stipulates: “If the plaintiff applies for withdrawal of a case before the verdict or ruling of an administrative case is declared, or if the defendant changes the specific administrative act it has made and the plaintiff agrees and applies for the withdrawal of the complaint, the people’s court shall decide whether or not to approve the case.” There is no law or judicial interpretation on the nature of “the defendant changes the specific administrative act it has undertaken” (hereinafter referred to as the change). In practice, there is a view that changing behavior belongs to the defendant in the administrative litigation action, not the defendant in the administrative proceedings continue to exercise administrative power administrative act, (“People’s Justice” 1992 the third period “the defendant to change the specific administrative act Analysis of procedural issues ”a) In this regard, I can not agree. Changing behavior is the defendant in the administrative proceedings, it may cause the plaintiff to apply for withdrawal and the people’s court ruled whether to allow the withdrawal proceedings