论文部分内容阅读
1.对以民间传说与神话资料作为中国古代体育起源的依据提出了质疑,认为这种研究在把握资料上缺乏理性分析,这些资料只能作为传说来看待。2.对中国体育史学家提出的人类原始的体育活动方式可以追溯到5万年到10万年甚至50万年以前提出不同意见。认为岩画不能作为中国古代体育最早的考古学证据,考古学家几乎没有发现任何证据证明史前时代的中国有体育存在。3.甲骨文不能作为体育史学提供证据,它所提供的一些活动不具备竞技的特点,不能纳入体育或竞技格斗的范畴。从考古学的观点来看,真正的体育只能追溯到后周时代。
1. Questioning the basis of folklore and mythology as the origin of Chinese ancient sports thinks that the research lacks rationality in grasping data, which can only be treated as legends. 2. The original way of sports for human beings proposed by Chinese sports historians can be traced back to 50,000 to 100,000 or even 500,000 years ago. That the rock paintings can not be the earliest archaeological evidence of ancient Chinese sports, archaeologists found little evidence that prehistoric China’s existence of physical education. 3. Oracle can not provide evidence for the history of sports. Some of the activities it provides do not possess competitive features and can not be included in sports or competitive combat. From an archeological point of view, real sports can only be traced back to the post-Zhou era.