《人民司法》1990年第10期刊登了汤海庆同志的《此案如何定性?由谁管辖?》(下称《汤文》)一文。作者认为,该案属一般的债权债务纠纷,应由被告所在地的县人民法院管辖,对此笔者持有异义。 异义之一,是对案由的确定。我们知道,准确、恰当地确定案由是正确审理经济纠纷案件的第一步。案由确定不准确、不恰当,会导致案件在适用何种管辖上,产生错误。根据最高人民法院有关案由的规定,案由是案件的内容提要,也是案件性质的集中体现,案由要简单明了,做到划分类别明确,反映争议确切,判断性质准确。简言之就是,看到案由就能使人知道双方当事人之间存在着什么样的民事法律关系 People's Justice, No. 10, 1990, published Comrade Tang Haiqing's article “How to define the case and who is governed by it?” (Hereinafter referred to as “Tang Wen”). The author believes that the case is a general dispute over claims and liabilities, the defendant shall be located in the county people's court jurisdiction, which I hold a different meaning. One of the different meanings is the determination of the case. We know that accurately and properly determining the case is the first step in the proper handling of economic disputes. The inaccuracy of the determination of the case and the inappropriateness of the case can lead to errors in what jurisdiction the case is applicable to. According to the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the cause of the case, the case is a summary of the contents of the case and a concentrated expression of the nature of the case. The case should be simple and clear, with a clear division of categories, an exact reflection of disputes and an accurate nature of judgment. In short, seeing the case can tell people what kind of civil legal relationship exists between the two parties