论文部分内容阅读
文书提出命令制度是大陆法系国家或地区的当事人在民事诉讼中向对方当事人或诉讼外第三人收集证据的最主要手段。近年来各个大陆法系国家和地区对文书提出命令制度都有了新的发展,该制度俨然已成改革热点。通过比较可以看出,我国民事诉讼当事人在收集证据方面缺乏最低的程序保障。为了有效解决当事人收集证据手段的欠缺和高要求的证明标准之间的矛盾,我国应以域外有关文书提出命令制度的具体内容为蓝本,从主体条件、范围、申请审查程序和法律效果等方面建立和完善我国的文书提出命令制度。
The instrument provides that the order system is the most important means for the parties in the civil law countries to collect evidence from the other party or the third party outside the civil suit in civil proceedings. In recent years, all civil law countries and regions have made new developments in the order system for instruments. The system has become a reform hot spot. By comparison, it can be seen that the litigants in civil litigation in our country lack the lowest procedural guarantee in collecting evidence. In order to effectively solve the contradiction between the lack of evidence gathering means and the high standard of proof, our country should set forth the concrete content of the order system proposed by the relevant documents outside the country, and set up the conditions and scope of the subject, the application and examination procedures and the legal effects And improve our instruments to put forward the order system.