论文部分内容阅读
在西方哲学的语言转向中,索绪尔和维特根斯坦在语言哲学领域中分别作出了不同贡献。在意义理论中,两者既有相同之处,也有相异之处。相同之处在于二者都提出了对命名论的批判、都恪守整体主义的意义观,相异之处在于二者对于判定意义的标准不同,索绪尔提出了形而上的“价值”决定论,维特根斯坦提出了形而下的“用法”决定论,而二者意义观的不同是他们语言观差异的体现。
In the linguistic turn of Western philosophy, Saussure and Wittgenstein made different contributions respectively in the field of language philosophy. In the theory of meaning, there are similarities and differences between the two. The difference is that both of them put forward the criticism of naming theory and abide by the concept of holism. The difference lies in that the two have different standards for determining significance, and Saussure puts forward the metaphysical “value” decision On the other hand, Wittgenstein proposed the metaphysical “usage ” determinism, and the difference between the two meanings is the manifestation of their difference in language concept.