最近,南京市教育局要求小学生实行“弹性离校”办法,凡正常放学后按时离校却有困难的小学生,由家长自愿提出书面申请,经学校批准后均可延迟离校时间。延迟的时间段里,老师要义务培同,并严禁学校利用这段时间补课或与校外机构勾结办收费的兴趣班等。这一举措,赢得了一片支持声,也一石激起千层浪,成为教育内外热议的一个话题,但笔者还没发现各地群起效仿的跟风现象,很多人还在怀疑这种天上掉馅饼的事“靠不靠谱”。这说明这件大家都叫好的事实施起来肯定有难处,不能仅靠教育局的“一厢情愿”。 Recently, the Nanjing Municipal Bureau of Education asked primary school students to implement the “flexible departure from school” approach. Students who have difficulty leaving school after their regular absence from school may voluntarily submit a written application by their parents, which may be delayed after school approval. During the delay period, teachers should comprehend their duties and prohibit schools from making up classes during this time or colluding with institutions outside the school to charge fees. This measure has won a piece of support and a ripple of waves, becoming a hot topic both inside and outside of education. However, I have not found any follow-up phenomenon that has taken shape around the world. Many people are still doubting this kind of pie Things “rely on unreliable ”. This shows that this is a good fact that we all applauded must have difficulty implementing it. We should not rely on the EDB’s “wishful thinking.”