历史是胜利者写的,因而失败者的言行往往被有意无意遮蔽、曲解、贬低。五四政治运动前夕发生的所谓新旧冲突,在近一个世纪里一直被描述为旧阵营对新势力的迫害,是旧学者与政治势力的勾结、合谋。其实,依据新旧史料重新解读各派政治势力的立场以及相互间的争执,可以清晰感到不论是新势力,还是旧势力,多少都有点误会,都将对手做了最大限度的恶意猜测。陈独秀之所以退出北大,胡适之之所以受到警告,固然有与旧派文人林纾、张厚载反复辩难的因素,但说到底张厚载、林纾并不像新派人物猜测的那样,成为政治迫害的“递刀者”。 History is written by the victor, so the words and deeds of the losers are often intentionally or unintentionally obscured, misinterpreted, belittled. The so-called old and new conflicts that occurred on the eve of the May 4 political campaign have been described for nearly a century as the persecution of new forces by the old camp and the collusion and conspiracies between the old scholars and political forces. In fact, based on the historical and historical re-reading of the positions of the political forces of various political parties and their disputes with each other, we can clearly feel that both the new forces and the old forces are somewhat misunderstood and make the greatest possible hostile speculation on their opponents. The reason why Chen Duxiu quit Peking University and Hu Shi was warned notwithstanding the repeated arguments with Lin Shu and Zhang Houzai of the old school, but in the end Zhang Linbo did not become the victim of political persecution just as the new faction speculated. Handed knife ".