论文部分内容阅读
学界的主流观点认为,执法行为应由代表国家的特定机关实施,从而禁止私人参与执法。本文借助“钓鱼执法”这一轰动事件,通过信息成本这一重要的约束条件,论证了只要国家财政支出预算是有限的,就有私人参与执法的可能性及其如何与公共执法形成良好的互动,并对与之相关的制度进行了初步考察。另外,通过与刑事诉讼中的“诱惑侦查”制度的比较,认为即使是行政执法行为,一旦某些条件满足时,适当允许“钓鱼执法”也是合理的。
The prevailing view in the academic community is that law enforcement should be carried out by specific agencies representing the state, thereby prohibiting private participation in law enforcement. This article uses the “fishing law enforcement” this sensational event, through the information cost of this important constraint, demonstrates that as long as the state budget for the fiscal expenditure is limited, there is the possibility of private participation in law enforcement and how it formed a good public law enforcement Of the interaction, and carried out a preliminary examination of the system associated with it. In addition, by comparison with the system of “temptation investigation” in criminal procedure, it is reasonable to allow appropriate “fishing law enforcement” once certain conditions are met, even in the case of administrative law enforcement.