论文部分内容阅读
合同解除的溯及力是合同解除效力的重要内容之一,目前对于合同解除的溯及力的观点主要有三种,即肯定说、否定说和折衷说。这三种观点均具有一定的合理性,但是都不够全面。事实上合同法第九十七条对合同解除的溯及力作出了具体规定,该条创设了一种选择权,即当合同主体的解除权从期待状态变为既得状态时,根据合同法第九十七条规定,合同主体可以对合同解除的后果进行选择,而解除权人选择内容的不同决定了合同解除的溯及力的有无。
The retrospective effect of rescission is one of the important contents of the contract rescission effect. At present, there are mainly three kinds of retroactive respects of contract rescission: affirmative, negative and compromise. All three views have some rationality, but they are not comprehensive enough. In fact, Article 97 of the Contract Law stipulates the retrospective effect of the termination of the contract, which creates an option that when the right of the subject of the contract to change from the expectation state to the vested state is changed, Article 97 stipulates that the subject of the contract may choose the consequences of rescission of the contract and the difference in the content of the choice of the dismissal determines the retroactivity of the contract.