论文部分内容阅读
由于环境公益保障的急迫性与环境公益修复的特殊性,环境公益诉讼的裁判方式应迥异于一般民事侵权诉讼的裁判方式。环境公益诉讼裁判方式有三大基本类型,即预防型裁判、修复型裁判、惩戒型裁判。每一种裁判方式,具有不同的启动原则、适用规则与效果展现,最终目的都是在于环境公益诉讼在法律功能上的最大化实现。环境公益诉讼还可以存在一种特殊型裁判,将裁判的既判力扩张至法定的案外人,这种裁判方式作为三大基本裁判类型的重要补充,可以在判决主文部分加以明确记载与陈述。
Due to the urgency of environmental public welfare and the special nature of environmental public welfare restoration, the way of judging environmental public interest litigation should be quite different from that of general civil tort litigation. There are three basic types of environmental commonweal litigation adjudication methods: prevention type remediation type retribution type punishment. Each mode of referee, with different principles of initiation, the application of rules and effects show, the ultimate goal is that environmental public interest litigation in the legal function to maximize the realization. There can also be a special type of referee in environmental public interest litigation, which can extend the referee’s referee to a legal outsider. As an important complement to the three basic referee types, such refereeing methods can be clearly recorded and stated in the main text of the ruling.