根据《刑事诉讼法》第九十三条的规定,检察机关行使羁押必要性审查权,对不需要继续羁押的,应当建议予以释放或者变更强制措施。在基层司法实践中,对于法条表述中“建议”概念的不同理解,弱化了检察机关羁押必要性审查权的刚性约束力,造成制度适用上的尴尬。文章在明确羁押必要性审查制度功能的基础上,提出应对第九十三条作出符合立法预期效果的解释,并针对制度缺乏相应的救济措施和制约机制的现状,提出制度上的优化设想。 According to the provisions of Article 93 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, procuratorial organs exercise the right of censorship of detention. If procuratorial organs do not need to continue their detention, they shall be suggested to release or change coercive measures. In the judicial practice at the grassroots level, the different understanding of the concept of “suggestion ” in the expression of law weakens the rigid binding power of the procuratorial authority to review the necessity of detention, resulting in the embarrassment of the application of the system. On the basis of clarifying the function of censorship of necessity of detention, the article puts forward the suggestion that the article 93 should be dealt with in line with the expected result of legislation and puts forward the institutional optimization hypothesis according to the lack of corresponding relief measures and restriction mechanism.