论文部分内容阅读
虚拟实在的本体论问题是本体论研究的一个重要方面,本文通过翟振明先生与黄勇先生关于虚拟实在争论的分析,发表作者的一点看法。翟氏力图通过对虚拟实在的论证最终达到他的“一锅端”时,由于他的不证自明的前提本身不具有合理性,所以他关于二者本体论对等的观点自然也就没有什么说服力了。黄氏在反驳他的观点过程中,由于他自己就是一个典型的反实在论者,他关于虚拟实在的本体论的实在论和认识论的实在论的反驳也是差强人意,因此并没有提出有力的证据。
The virtual reality ontology problem is an important aspect of ontology research. This article, through the analysis of the virtual reality argument by Mr.Zhai Zhenming and Mr. Huang Yong, presents the author’s opinion. Attempting to reach his “pot of potatoes” through the demonstration of virtual reality, Zhai attempts naturally because of his self-evident premise itself is not reasonable, so his view on the equivalence of the two ontology naturally has nothing Convincing During his refute of his point of view, Huang himself was a typical anti-realist. His refutation of the ontological realism of the virtual reality and the realism of epistemology were also unsatisfactory and did not provide strong evidence.