论文部分内容阅读
《语文教学与研究》一九八五年第八期发表了郭金荣同志的文章《“榔”应读hu》(以下简称郭文)。郭文认为,高中语文第二册的编者将《猎户》一文中“檞树”的“檞”字注成“jie”是错误的,“檞”应读“hu”,而且它不是多音字,只有“hu”一个音。为了证明这一观点,郭文还引了高中语文第四册编者将达尔文的《物种起源》导言一文中檞寄生的“檞”字注成“hu”音作为佐证。
“Chinese Teaching and Research” In the eighth issue of 1985, Comrade Guo Jinrong published an essay entitled “hu” should read “hu” (hereinafter referred to as Guo Wen). Guo Wen believes that it is wrong for the editor of the second volume of high school Chinese to mark the word “ie” as “jie” in “户” “in the article” Orion. “” 檞 “should read” hu. “And it is not polyphone. Only ”hu“ one tone. In order to prove this point, Guo Wen also cited the fourth volume of high school Chinese language editors as ”Darwin’s“ introduction of the origin of the article ”parasitic“ 檞 ”word as“ hu ”sound as evidence.