论文部分内容阅读
本文在阐述森岛通夫和置盐信雄传统方法缺陷的基础上,详细讨论了森岛通夫、约翰·罗默以及吉原直毅和韦内齐亚尼等学者对森岛—置盐方法的反思和修改,展现了西方学者对马克思劳动价值论和剥削理论的数理研究的一个发展分支。这一分支不再使用传统的“马克思—斯拉法”方法,而从技术以及经济单位个体为视角研究“剥削”。本文从劳动价值定义的稳定性、“商品剥削论(CET)”和西方学者对马克思剥削理论的解释误区等各个角度分析了这一分支的学者对劳动价值论和剥削理论的数理研究的发展及缺陷,同时也指出了这些工作当中值得认真研究和参考借鉴的内容。
On the basis of the defects of the traditional method of Morimoto Toshio and Yasuhiro Matsutake, this paper discusses in detail the reflection and modification of Morimoto-Osamu method by scholars such as Morishima, John Romer, and Yoshihiro Motoki and Venezzini , Which shows that western scholars develop a branch of mathematical research on Marx’s labor theory of value and exploitation. This branch no longer uses the traditional “Marx-Slavery” approach, but studies “exploitation” from the perspective of technology and individual economic units. This paper analyzes the mathematical studies of labor theory of value and exploitation based on the stability of the definition of labor value, the theory of “commodity exploitation” (CET), and the misunderstanding of the theory of Marxist exploitation by western scholars. Development and defects, but also pointed out that these work worthy of careful study and reference for the content.