论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院近日发布司法解释,明确提出利用自媒体等转载网络信息行为的过错及程度认定问题。根据规定,添加或者修改文章标题,导致其与内容严重不符成为转载行为过错认定的因素之一。10月9日发布的这份司法解释的全称为《最高人民法院关于审理利用信息网络侵害人身权益民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》,其第10条规定:“人民法院认定网络用户或者网络服务提供者转载网络信息行为的过错及其程度,应当综合以下因素:(一)转载主体所承担的与其性质、
Supreme People’s Court recently released judicial interpretation, clearly put forward the use of self-media and other information reproduced from the network of fault and degree of identification. According to the regulations, add or modify the title of the article, resulting in serious inconsistency with the contents of one of the factors that determine the fault of the reproduced act. The full name of the judicial interpretation released on October 9 is ”Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases of Civil Disputes against the Rights and Interests of Personal Data Using Information Networks.“ Article 10 of the Supreme People’s Court stipulates that: ”The People’s Court finds that the Internet users or Network service providers reproduced network information of the fault and its extent, should be combined with the following factors: (a) reproduced by the main commitment and its nature,