论文部分内容阅读
去年下半年以来,上海市民朱虹诉医生陈贯一、上海科技报社侵害肖像权案引起医务、新闻和其他各界人士的关注,除解放日报、新民晚报和本刊(见今年第1期《沪七起新闻案述略》一文)作了报道外,《民主与法制》(北京)《法律咨询》(北京)《政治与法律》(上海)《新闻知识》(陕西)等刊物还发表论文、通讯,表达了各种不同意见。一些医务界、新闻界、法律界人士对此案进行了讨论或议论。 1989年5月5日,上海科技报在健康版“专家门诊”专栏上发表题为《眼科老中医陈贯一诊治重症肌无力症疗效好》的医学科普报道。这篇报道是上海科技报的医学编辑根据陈贯一提供的关于治疗疑难病
Since the second half of last year, Shanghai people Zhu Hong v. Doctors Chen Guanyi and the Shanghai Science and Technology Newspaper Office have infringed the portrait rights and interests of medical practitioners, news and other people. Apart from the Liberation Daily, Xinmin Evening News and the magazine (see No. 1 in Shanghai this year) In addition, some publications such as “Journalism and Law” (Shanghai) “Press Knowledge” (Shaanxi) published in “Legal Consultation on Democracy and the Legal System” (Beijing) Communication, expressed a variety of different opinions. Some medical circles, the press and the legal profession have discussed or discussed the case. May 5, 1989, Shanghai Science and Technology newspaper in the health version of “expert outpatient” column published an article entitled “ophthalmic old Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis a good effect” medical science reports. This article is based on the medical editor of Shanghai Science and Technology, according to Chen Guanyi on the treatment of difficult diseases