论文部分内容阅读
近几年来宪法司法化和物权法违宪之争使得一直流传于民法学界的言语中的民法宪法同位论开始大行其道。这个观点提出有着深刻的时代原因,是宪法的边缘地位遇上了社会上对民法的过度希望的结果。然后由于私法和公法划分的非绝对化以及私法自治需要公法强有力的保障,对于市民社会和政治国家的两分并不能直接的、必然的、对应到民法和宪法中来等原因将导致民法宪法同位缺乏理论和现实的支撑。“认真对待宪法”才是解决之道。
In recent years, the controversy over constitutional judicialization and the unconstitutionality of property law has caused the widespread adoption of the constitutional isomerism in the language of civil law scholars. This view puts forward a profound reason for the times. It is the result of the constitutional marginalization that meets with the excessive social hopes for civil law. Then, due to the non-absolute division of private law and public law and the strong guarantee of public law, the dichotomy between the civil society and the political state can not be directly or inevitably correspond to the civil law and the constitution, which will lead to the civil constitution The lack of co-position theory and realistic support. “Seriously treat the constitution ” is the solution.