莱维纳斯的“爱欲现象学”在《总体与无限》一书中究竟占据怎样一种地位,似乎不甚明朗,甚至有学者认为是信手之作。笔者认为这部分内容对于理解莱维纳斯思想不可或缺。而且“爱欲现象学”具有多重意涵,不可偏颇。即对“爱欲现象学”的解读不能仅仅局限于爱欲问题上,而应该沿着他原本的思路逐步展开,从而揭示出“繁殖”、“父性”、“子女”、“兄弟之爱”等一系列环节,展示出“爱欲现象学”中所蕴涵的多重意味,及其与莱维纳斯政治思想的内在关系。 Levinas “Eros Phenomenology ” in the “total and unlimited” in what kind of book occupy a position, it seems unclear, and even some scholars think it is a masterpiece. I think this part is indispensable for understanding Levinas’ thought. And “Eros Phenomenology ” has multiple meanings, can not be biased. That is to say, the interpretation of “Eros Phenomenology ” should not be confined to the problem of Eros, but should be gradually carried out along his original train of thought to reveal the “Propagation”, “Fatherhood”, “Children ”, “ Brother ’s love ”and a series of links, showing “ Eros Phenomenology ”contains multiple meanings, and its internal relations with Levinas political thought.