论文部分内容阅读
由于我国立法的缺失,对乌木的法律属性难以界定,对乌木所有权的归属没有明确的法律法条和司法解释可供法院作为裁判的依据,直接导致了相关乌木权属争议事件中对乌木归属处置结果的不同。乌木所有权归属争议的焦点在于当事人对乌木的法律性质做出了不同的解释,究其根源,在于埋藏物、矿产资源、天然孳息的法律定义不清晰。本文以分析理论界、实务界争议颇多的“某地乌木案”为视角,讨论在先占制度缺失的情况下,以当前的法律框和司法实践,法院在审判中的法律适用问题。分析有关乌木法律属性的争议观点,探究并发现在我国当前法律体系下解决乌木归属问题所面临的困境。
Due to the lack of legislation in our country, it is difficult to define the legal attributes of Ebony. There is no clear legal law and judicial interpretation for the ownership of ebony. Therefore, it is the basis for the court to judge the court, which directly leads to the disposal of the ownership of ebony Different results. The focus of the dispute over ownership of ebony lies in the different interpretations made by the parties to the legal nature of ebony. The root cause lies in the unclear legal definition of burial objects, mineral resources and natural fruits. This article analyzes the legal application of the court in the trial under the current legal framework and judicial practice in the absence of the preemption system from the perspective of analyzing “somewhere in the ebony case”, which has many controversies in theory and practice. Analyzes the controversial viewpoints on the legal attributes of ebony, explores and finds out the dilemmas faced in solving the problem of ownership of ebony under the current legal system in our country.