论文部分内容阅读
目的观察急诊护理路径用于急性心肌梗死患者的抢救效果。方法将急性心肌梗死患者80例随机分为观察组与对照组,每组40例。观察组实施急诊护理路径干预,对照组采取急诊科常规护理方法,统计并比较2组抢救成功率及生命体征(血压、心率等)、急诊室停留时间和住院时间,比较2组住院费用。结果观察组抢救成功率、心率高于对照组,收缩压水平低于对照组,急诊室停留时间、住院时间短于对照组,住院费用少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对急诊急性心肌梗死患者采取急诊护理路径能有效缩短急诊时间与住院时间,减轻医药费用,减轻患者的经济负担,提高患者的生活质量。
Objective To observe the emergency nursing path for the rescue of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods 80 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 40 cases in each group. The intervention group took emergency nursing intervention and the control group took the routine care method of emergency department. The rescue success rate and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, etc.), emergency room stay and hospital stay were compared and statistically analyzed. The hospitalization costs were compared between the two groups. Results The rescue success rate and heart rate of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, the systolic blood pressure was lower than that of the control group, the stay time of the emergency room, hospitalization time was shorter than that of the control group, hospitalization cost was less than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05 ). Conclusions Taking emergency care pathways for emergency patients with acute myocardial infarction can shorten the emergency time and hospitalization time, reduce the medical costs, reduce the financial burden on patients and improve the quality of life of patients.