论文部分内容阅读
股东会决议是公司自治的产物,外界一般不应予以干涉。但是,当决议存在瑕疵,进而影响到股东和公司利益时,作为权利救济最后一道屏障的司法就有必要进行适度干预。司法干预公司自治有无合理性,其界限在哪里,以及该如何干预。文章试图从司法干预股东会决议的合理性基础,司法干预的限度以及我国公司立法的现状及完善等问题进行相应的探讨和分析。
Shareholders’ resolution is a product of corporate autonomy, and the outside world should not normally intervene. However, when there are flaws in the resolution, which in turn affect the interests of shareholders and corporations, the judiciary, as the last barrier to remedy the rights, will need to moderately intervene. Judicial interference with the autonomy of the company is not justified, where is the limit, and how to intervene. The article tries to discuss and analyze the rationality of the resolution of judicial intervention in shareholders’ meeting, the limit of judicial intervention and the status quo and perfection of the legislation of our company.