论文部分内容阅读
拙作《试从日语借方贷方原义释借贷》(发表于《广西会计》1990年第1期),受到曾向东同志异议(详见《广西会计》1990年第7期《对〈试从日语借方贷方原义释借贷〉一文的异议》,以下简称“曾文”)。异议亦是一种重视,谢谢向东同志的重视。现在就“曾文”所提异议,略抒管见,以就教于向东同志,并请广大读者指正。学术讨论,赞成什么,异议什么,应该有个能为讨论双疗和众多的第三者共同认可的标准。这个标准应该是客观的真理,而不能是主观的感觉。什么是真理?真理是对客观事实的反映。和真理对应的是谬误。真理和谬误的区别就在于是否正确地反映客观实际。笔者统观“曾文”,并未见以客观的标准,指出拙文谬误所在。例如:何处违背历史事实,
My Book of Merit, “Provisional Borrowing from Japanese Borrowers” (published in “Guangxi Accounting”, No. 1, 1990), has been challenged by Zeng Xiangdong (see “Guangxi Accounting” The original interpretation of loans> a dissent “, hereinafter referred to as” Tseng Wen “). Objections are also a kind of attention, thank you, Comrade Dong Dong. Now on the ”Tse Man“ objections, a little sketch, in order to teach in the east comrades, and please readers correct. Academic discussion, what to agree with, what to disagree with, there should be a standard that can be used to discuss biotherapy and numerous third parties. This criterion should be objective truth, not subjective feeling. What is truth? Truth is a reflection of objective facts. And the truth corresponds to the fallacy. The difference between truth and error lies in whether it correctly reflects the objective reality. The author unifies ”Teng Wen", does not see the objective standard, pointed out the myth fallacy lies. For example: where contrary to historical facts,